But at the very next moment, when the hearer is about to embark upon the venture of knowing whether he knows p, doubts may arise. However, the question is how much of what I know is valid. Stroud, Barry. The distinction between the two forms of epistemology is that traditional epistemologists accept what they think they know whereas natural epistemologists put what they think they know to empirical tests.
On sceptical reasoning in general, see DeRose and Warfield Responses to Gettier[ edit ] This section does not cite any sources. Besides, had his teachings been significant, surely they would have been assimilated into the minds of people during the many centuries that have passed by since his times and consolidated in the human progr Since we are seeking a match between our mind and the world, justified beliefs are those which result from processes which regularly achieve such a match.
Still, do we ever have reason to regard all of our beliefs about the physical world as actually false? The modern version of the evil demon scenario is that you are a brain-in-a-vatbecause scientists have removed your brain from your skull, connected it to a sophisticated computer, and immersed it in a vat of preservative fluid.
It does remind us of why the alternative should be sought: Knowing would be our protection against that potential emptiness within our lives. I like to think of myself the same way.
The knowledge we understand off can overtake some of the other ideas that we have found